According to digopaul, copy is the action of copying (reproducing exactly and faithfully, imitating, repeating). It is possible to copy through a mechanical means (such as a photocopier) or by hand (trying to draw by hand what appears in a painting).
The concept, whose origin goes back to the Latin word ” copy”, can be understood in a literal or symbolic sense. The copy of a musical disc is exact: the content that appears on the original disc is duplicated to obtain a new copy, which is identical to the first. One can speak, however, of a copy to refer to an imitation, even if it is unconscious or not admitted. In this way, it can be said that one artist copied another to create his own works with a pretense of originality.
The advancement of technology has made copying one of the pillars of piracy. The law prohibits the duplication of artistic works and products that are protected by intellectual property rights. This means that a creator (a writer, a musician, a filmmaker, etc.) has the right to use and exploit his own creations according to his interests. Therefore, if someone copies a protected work without authorization, he directly infringes that right.
Although it may seem like the stuff of a bad joke, there is an unfortunate debate about the validity of copying works for personal use or private reproduction. Some argue that downloading a disc or a movie from the Internet is not a crime as long as there is no attempt to profit from its use. The work of artists and developers must be respected and if they decide to put a price on their creations, no one should ignore this barrier.
Recent years have seen an alarming growth in piracy of music and digital content, such as movies and video games. Losses made by some companies exceeded normal margins, and many were forced to close their doors for good.
Undoubtedly, one of the reasons for such an increase in unauthorized copying has been the advancement of technological tools placed in the hands of the public: increasingly powerful computers, CD, DVD and Blu-ray copiers, super Internet services rapid. All this has given the final consumer a power that he is not prepared to control ; And when greed and financial interests come into play, the consequences can be devastating.
But everything does not end there; Those who are in favor of piracy tend to support their position by their economic difficulties in acquiring their favorite products, given the high market prices. On the other hand, it is common to hear complaints about the lack of coherence between the salaries of certain internationally famous film directors, actors and singers, and the modest income of an average middle-class person, and that this imbalance is used as a basis for “Don’t continue to make millionaires rich.”
Faced with this crisis, two well-defined positions emerged: some companies chose to reinforce their anti-piracy techniques, while others revalued the prices of their products and services, and began to look for new options to lower production costs. The first path is, most likely, the riskiest, since for each new security measure a new method to break it arises.
The second option, on the other hand, represents the most pronounced trend in recent times, since more and more artists are trying to distribute their creations at more accessible prices, either in smaller proportions or using less expensive sales channels, such as digital marketplaces. Piracy seems impossible to eradicate, but it can be mitigated when the offers are tempting and satisfy the public.